London Borough of Lewisham

How Lewisham decides on small housing schemes

Every decision on sites of nine units or fewer, coded from the council's own register and refreshed each quarter. What gets built, what gets approved, and what trips applications up.

Last updated April 2026 325 applications tracked Window: Jan 2023 to Mar 2026 8 areas, 5 scheme types
Applications logged
325
Full, householder and minor resi since Jan 2023
Decided so far
279
148 approved, 131 refused, 13 withdrawn
Approval rate
53%
Just over half of decided applications
Typical time to decide
8 weeks
Median determination time across all small sites

Lewisham, area by area

Colour shows how often applications get approved. Numbers show how many were decided. Hover or tap an area for detail.

Deptford & New Cross 16 Brockley 40 Lewisham Central 26 Blackheath & Lee 30 Hither Green 32 Catford 49 Grove Park & Downham 28 Forest Hill & Sydenham 55 Approval rate 34% 73%
Spotlight

Deptford & New Cross

Decisions
16
Approved
10
Refused
6
Approval rate
62%
Hover or tap any tile to see that area’s detail.
Tile positions are schematic, not to geographic scale. Each hex represents one of Lewisham’s sub-areas as defined in the council’s own planning framework.

Lewisham Central approves 73% of applications. Hither Green, closer to 34%. Same borough, same policy, 39 percentage points of difference.

Which kinds of schemes get approved?

Bar length shows how many of each type were decided. The split shows the share approved versus refused. Conversion is by far the most common route in Lewisham, but it's backland that sees the highest approval rate.

Approved Refused Bar length = sample size (max n=94)
Conversion
49%n=94
Demolish & rebuild
55%n=73
Backland
67%n=36
Mid-terrace
48%n=31
Extension
31%n=16
Scheme types with fewer than 10 decisions in the window are not shown here.
Conversion, dividing one home into flats
Demolish & rebuild, existing building replaced with new homes
Backland, new build on rear gardens or courtyard land
Mid-terrace, insertion into the middle of a terrace
Extension, rear, side or upward additions creating a new unit

Why applications fail in Lewisham

Of every hundred reasons cited in refused decisions in Lewisham, design quality accounts for the biggest slice at 35%.

Design quality, bulk, massing, appearance 35
Other, mixed reasons 19
Open space, loss of garden or green space 10
Amenity, overlooking, daylight, noise 10
Transport, parking, safety, access 9
Policy, affordable housing, density targets 6
Flood risk 3
Unit sizes, below space standards 2
Permitted development 2
Infrastructure, access, parking, drainage 2
Read as: “Of every 100 reasons cited in a refusal, 35 relate to design quality.” A single refusal often names two or more reasons. Based on 359 reasons extracted from refused decision notices.

In Lewisham, what gets a scheme refused is usually how it looks, not how many homes it adds.

Thinking about a specific site?

The dashboard gives you the borough picture. If you have a particular address in mind, we can tell you what the comparable decisions say about your odds, density and capacity.

Data sources & method

Applications. Sourced from the Greater London Authority (GLA) Planning Datahub and Lewisham Council’s online planning register. Covers full planning, householder, and minor residential applications of nine units or fewer decided in the window shown above.

Decisions and timing. Outcomes and determination times are taken from the council’s published decision notices.

Refusal reasons. Extracted from refused decision notices that were publicly available. Not every refusal has a readable notice, so totals count all refusals but the reason breakdown covers only those we could read.

Scheme classification. Site types (conversion, demolish & rebuild, extension, and so on) are coded from application descriptions and drawings. Areas are mapped from postcodes and ward names using the council’s own sub-area definitions.

Update frequency. Refreshed quarterly. Next refresh: July 2026.

Nothing here is planning advice. Outcomes are historical and do not predict individual cases. Approval rates vary with site specifics, policy context, and case officer. For a read on a particular site, request a Site Assessment. See our Terms of Use for full details on how this data is compiled and the limits of its use.