London Borough of Sutton

How Sutton decides on small housing schemes

Every decision on sites of nine units or fewer, coded from the council's own register and refreshed each quarter. What gets built, what gets approved, and what trips applications up.

Last updated April 2026 284 applications tracked Window: Jan 2023 to Mar 2026 7 areas, 3 scheme types
Applications logged
284
Full, householder and minor resi since Jan 2023
Decided so far
252
171 approved, 81 refused, 16 withdrawn
Approval rate
68%
Roughly two in three decided applications
Typical time to decide
8 weeks
Median determination time across all small sites

Sutton, area by area

Colour shows how often applications get approved. Numbers show how many were decided. Hover or tap an area for detail.

Sutton 74 Cheam 36 Carshalton 17 Wallington 54 Beddington 21 Belmont 24 Worcester Park 26 Approval rate 56% 86%
Spotlight

Sutton

Decisions
74
Approved
53
Refused
21
Approval rate
72%
Hover or tap any tile to see that area’s detail.
Tile positions are schematic, not to geographic scale. Each hex represents one of Sutton’s sub-areas as defined in the council’s own planning framework.

Beddington approves 86% of applications. Wallington, closer to 56%. Same borough, same policy, 30 percentage points of difference.

Which kinds of schemes get approved?

Bar length shows how many of each type were decided. The split shows the share approved versus refused. conversions are both the most common route in Sutton and the type with the highest approval rate.

Approved Refused Bar length = sample size (max n=167)
Conversion
70%n=167
Demolish & rebuild
62%n=47
Extension
54%n=13
Scheme types with fewer than 10 decisions in the window are not shown here.
Conversion, dividing one home into flats
Demolish & rebuild, existing building replaced with new homes
Extension, rear, side or upward additions creating a new unit

Why applications fail in Sutton

Of every hundred reasons cited in refused decisions in Sutton, design quality accounts for the biggest slice at 20%.

Design quality, bulk, massing, appearance 20
Open space, loss of garden or green space 16
Amenity, overlooking, daylight, noise 16
Infrastructure, access, parking, drainage 12
Transport, parking, safety, access 12
Permitted development 8
Policy, affordable housing, density targets 8
Unit sizes, below space standards 4
Other, mixed reasons 4
Read as: “Of every 100 reasons cited in a refusal, 20 relate to design quality.” A single refusal often names two or more reasons. Based on 25 reasons extracted from refused decision notices.

In Sutton, what gets a scheme refused is usually how it looks, not how many homes it adds.

Is Sutton getting busier?

Decisions per quarter have held roughly steady since 2023, and approval rates have stayed in the same band over the same window.

Decisions per quarter
Approval rate (%)
0 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% borough avg 68% '23 Q3 · 42% · n=12 '23 Q4 · 48% · n=23 '24 Q1 · 71% · n=17 '24 Q2 · 78% · n=23 '24 Q3 · 70% · n=10 '24 Q4 · 70% · n=23 '25 Q1 · 80% · n=35 '25 Q2 · 85% · n=20 '25 Q3 · 86% · n=14 '25 Q4 · 65% · n=20 '26 Q1 · 75% · n=16 '26 Q2 · 67% · n=15 '26 Q3 · 0% · n=1 '23 Q3 '23 Q4 '24 Q1 '24 Q2 '24 Q3 '24 Q4 '25 Q1 '25 Q2 '25 Q3 '25 Q4 '26 Q1 '26 Q2 '26 Q3
Hover any bar or dot for exact quarterly values. The most recent quarter may be partial while pending decisions work through.

Interrogate the data yourself

Every figure on this page comes from Sutton's own planning decisions. We publish the underlying data so you can check it, replicate our findings, or use it in your own tools. Verify against the council's planning portal before relying on any record, and tell us if you spot a problem.

Decided small-site applications, 1 to 9 units. Planning-decision layer only: Energy Performance Certificate, Land Registry and case-officer fields are held back. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Methodology.

Thinking about a specific site?

The dashboard gives you the borough picture. If you’re weighing a particular site, the Red Line Review is an independent second opinion before you commit six figures — one sentence on what I’d do if it were my money, and why.

Data sources & method

Applications. Sourced from the Greater London Authority (GLA) Planning Datahub and Sutton Council’s online planning register. Covers full planning, householder, and minor residential applications of nine units or fewer decided in the window shown above.

Decisions and timing. Outcomes and determination times are taken from the council’s published decision notices.

Refusal reasons. Extracted from refused decision notices that were publicly available. Not every refusal has a readable notice, so totals count all refusals but the reason breakdown covers only those we could read.

Scheme classification. Site types (conversion, demolish & rebuild, extension, and so on) are coded from application descriptions and drawings. Areas are mapped from postcodes and ward names using the council’s own sub-area definitions.

Update frequency. Refreshed quarterly. Next refresh: July 2026.

Nothing here is planning advice. Outcomes are historical and do not predict individual cases. Approval rates vary with site specifics, policy context, and case officer. For a read on a particular site, request a Red Line Review. See our Terms of Use for full details on how this data is compiled and the limits of its use.