London Borough of Richmond upon Thames

How Richmond upon Thames decides on small housing schemes

Every decision on sites of nine units or fewer, coded from the council's own register and refreshed each quarter. What gets built, what gets approved, and what trips applications up.

Last updated April 2026 377 applications tracked Window: Jan 2023 to Mar 2026 8 areas, 4 scheme types
Applications logged
377
Full, householder and minor resi since Jan 2023
Decided so far
252
200 approved, 52 refused, 16 withdrawn
Approval rate
79%
Roughly two in three decided applications
Typical time to decide
8 weeks
Median determination time across all small sites

Richmond upon Thames, area by area

Colour shows how often applications get approved. Numbers show how many were decided. Hover or tap an area for detail.

Barnes & Mortlake 25 East Sheen 16 Richmond 32 Kew 6 Twickenham 36 Whitton & Fulwell 29 Teddington 23 Hampton 11 Approval rate 56% 83%
Spotlight

Barnes & Mortlake

Decisions
25
Approved
14
Refused
11
Approval rate
56%
Hover or tap any tile to see that area’s detail.
Tile positions are schematic, not to geographic scale. Each hex represents one of Richmond upon Thames’s sub-areas as defined in the council’s own planning framework.

Kew approves 83% of applications. Barnes & Mortlake, closer to 56%. Same borough, same policy, 27 percentage points of difference.

Which kinds of schemes get approved?

Bar length shows how many of each type were decided. The split shows the share approved versus refused. conversions are both the most common route in Richmond upon Thames and the type with the highest approval rate.

Approved Refused Bar length = sample size (max n=114)
Conversion
84%n=114
Demolish & rebuild
70%n=44
Extension
78%n=36
Backland
62%n=13
Scheme types with fewer than 10 decisions in the window are not shown here.
Conversion, dividing one home into flats
Demolish & rebuild, existing building replaced with new homes
Extension, rear, side or upward additions creating a new unit
Backland, new build on rear gardens or courtyard land

Why applications fail in Richmond upon Thames

Of every hundred reasons cited in refused decisions in Richmond upon Thames, design quality accounts for the biggest slice at 67%.

Design quality, bulk, massing, appearance 67
Amenity, overlooking, daylight, noise 7
Transport, parking, safety, access 6
Infrastructure, access, parking, drainage 6
Other, mixed reasons 5
Flood risk 3
Open space, loss of garden or green space 3
Policy, affordable housing, density targets 2
Delegated process 1
Read as: “Of every 100 reasons cited in a refusal, 67 relate to design quality.” A single refusal often names two or more reasons. Based on 153 reasons extracted from refused decision notices.

In Richmond upon Thames, what gets a scheme refused is usually how it looks, not how many homes it adds.

Thinking about a specific site?

The dashboard gives you the borough picture. If you have a particular address in mind, we can tell you what the comparable decisions say about your odds, density and capacity.

Data sources & method

Applications. Sourced from the Greater London Authority (GLA) Planning Datahub and Richmond upon Thames Council’s online planning register. Covers full planning, householder, and minor residential applications of nine units or fewer decided in the window shown above.

Decisions and timing. Outcomes and determination times are taken from the council’s published decision notices.

Refusal reasons. Extracted from refused decision notices that were publicly available. Not every refusal has a readable notice, so totals count all refusals but the reason breakdown covers only those we could read.

Scheme classification. Site types (conversion, demolish & rebuild, extension, and so on) are coded from application descriptions and drawings. Areas are mapped from postcodes and ward names using the council’s own sub-area definitions.

Update frequency. Refreshed quarterly. Next refresh: July 2026.

Nothing here is planning advice. Outcomes are historical and do not predict individual cases. Approval rates vary with site specifics, policy context, and case officer. For a read on a particular site, request a Site Assessment. See our Terms of Use for full details on how this data is compiled and the limits of its use.