Evidence/London Small Sites/Redbridge

Redbridge

Small residential planning decisions from January 2023 onwards, coded from the council’s own register to the same method used in all 33 London planning authorities.

906 applications · 798 decided · 51% approved Data to Feb 2026 Release August 2026

Applications logged

906

Full, householder and minor resi since Feb 2023

Decided so far

798

407 approved, 391 refused, 43 withdrawn

Approval rate

51%

Just over half of decided applications

Typical time to decide

8 weeks

Median determination time across all small sites

Redbridge, area by area

Colour shows how often applications get approved. Numbers show how many were decided. Hover or tap an area for detail.

Spotlight

Ilford

Decisions

Approved

Refused

Approval rate

53%

Hover or tap any tile to see that area’s detail.

Tile positions are schematic, not to geographic scale. Each hex represents one of Redbridge’s sub-areas as defined in the council’s own planning framework.

Across Redbridge, approval rates move in a 11-point band from Barkingside (48%) up to Woodford (59%).

Which kinds of schemes get approved?

Bar length shows how many of each type were decided. The split shows the share approved versus refused. Conversion is by far the most common route in Redbridge, but it's demolish & rebuild that sees the highest approval rate.

Approved Refused Bar length = sample size (max n=511)

Conversion

45%n=511

Demolish & rebuild

62%n=144

End-of-terrace

60%n=53

Extension

62%n=47

Scheme types with fewer than 10 decisions in the window are not shown here.

Conversion, dividing one home into flats

Demolish & rebuild, existing building replaced with new homes

End-of-terrace, new infill at the end of a terraced row

Extension, rear, side or upward additions creating a new unit

Why applications fail in Redbridge

Of every hundred reasons cited in refused decisions in Redbridge, space standards accounts for the biggest slice at 33%.

Space 33%

Insufficient 14%

Infrastructure 14%

Policy 10%

Design 9%

Space standards, unit and room sizes, ceiling heights, private outdoor space 33

Insufficient information, missing reports, surveys or assessments 14

Infrastructure, drainage, energy, biodiversity 14

Policy, land use, affordable housing, principle of development 10

Design quality, bulk, massing, appearance, materials 9

Transport and parking, parking, highway safety, cycle storage 6

Neighbour amenity, overlooking, loss of light, privacy, noise 6

Permitted development, prior approval conditions not met 3

Loss of existing use, commercial, employment or community floorspace 2

Heritage, conservation areas, listed buildings 1

Read as: “Of every 100 reasons cited in a refusal, 33 relate to space standards.” A single refusal often names two or more reasons. Based on 903 reasons extracted from refused decision notices.

In Redbridge, the most common ground for refusal is space standards.

Is Redbridge getting busier?

Decisions per quarter have held roughly steady since 2023, and approval rates have edged down over the same window.

Decisions per quarter

Approval rate (%)

Hover any bar or dot for exact quarterly values. The most recent quarter may be partial while pending decisions work through.

Interrogate the data yourself

Every figure on this page comes from Redbridge's own planning decisions. We publish the underlying data so you can check it, replicate our findings, or use it in your own tools. Verify against the council's planning portal before relying on any record, and tell us if you spot a problem.

Download the data (Excel) CSV

Decided small-site applications, 1 to 9 units. Planning-decision layer only: Energy Performance Certificate, Land Registry and case-officer fields are held back. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Planning London Datahub, Greater London Authority. Method.

About these figures

The figures describe decided applications for one to nine homes. They show what has happened in Redbridge over the period covered; they do not predict the outcome of an individual application, and no approval probability is offered for any site or scheme.

Sample sizes are shown with the findings. Where the available evidence is too thin for a result to carry meaning, it is withheld or marked accordingly.

Method Current release Compare other boroughs

Research using this evidence

Research Given what you received: the outcome differential — Redbridge’s mix-adjusted differential is −0.5 points.

All research →

Data sources & method

Applications. Sourced from the Greater London Authority (GLA) Planning Datahub and Redbridge Council’s online planning register. Covers full planning, householder, and minor residential applications of nine units or fewer decided in the window shown above.

Decisions and timing. Outcomes and determination times are taken from the council’s published decision notices.

Refusal reasons. Extracted from refused decision notices that were publicly available. Not every refusal has a readable notice, so totals count all refusals but the reason breakdown covers only those we could read.

Scheme classification. Site types (conversion, demolish & rebuild, extension, and so on) are coded from application descriptions and drawings. Areas are mapped from postcodes and ward names using the council’s own sub-area definitions.

Update frequency. Refreshed quarterly. Next refresh: October 2026.

Nothing here is planning advice. Outcomes are historical and do not predict individual cases. Approval rates vary with site specifics, policy context, and case officer. See our Terms of Use for full details on how this data is compiled and the limits of its use.