Evidence/London Small Sites/Southwark

Southwark

Small residential planning decisions from January 2023 onwards, coded from the council’s own register to the same method used in all 33 London planning authorities.

278 applications · 204 decided · 72% approved Data to Dec 2026 Release August 2026
Applications logged
278
Full, householder and minor resi since Jan 2023
Decided so far
204
146 approved, 58 refused, 21 withdrawn
Approval rate
72%
Roughly two in three decided applications
Typical time to decide
15 weeks
Median determination time across all small sites

Southwark, area by area

Colour shows how often applications get approved. Numbers show how many were decided. Hover or tap an area for detail.

Bermondsey 12 Borough & Bankside 33 Camberwell 16 Dulwich 65 Nunhead & Peckham Rye 25 Old Kent Road 4 Peckham 21 Rotherhithe 13 Walworth 15 Approval rate 50% 85%
Spotlight

Bermondsey

Decisions
12
Approved
10
Refused
2
Approval rate
83%
Hover or tap any tile to see that area’s detail.
Tile positions are schematic, not to geographic scale. Each hex represents one of Southwark’s sub-areas as defined in the council’s own planning framework.

Rotherhithe approves 85% of applications. Old Kent Road, closer to 50%. Same borough, same policy, 35 percentage points of difference.

Which kinds of schemes get approved?

Bar length shows how many of each type were decided. The split shows the share approved versus refused. Conversion is by far the most common route in Southwark, but it's demolish & rebuild that sees the highest approval rate.

Approved Refused Bar length = sample size (max n=57)
Conversion
61%n=57
Demolish & rebuild
93%n=41
Extension
68%n=22
Backland
76%n=17
End-of-terrace
86%n=14
Mid-terrace
55%n=11
Scheme types with fewer than 10 decisions in the window are not shown here.
Conversion, dividing one home into flats
Demolish & rebuild, existing building replaced with new homes
Extension, rear, side or upward additions creating a new unit
Backland, new build on rear gardens or courtyard land
End-of-terrace, new infill at the end of a terraced row
Mid-terrace, insertion into the middle of a terrace

Why applications fail in Southwark

Of every hundred reasons cited in refused decisions in Southwark, other accounts for the biggest slice at 38%.

Other, mixed or uncategorised reasons 38
Policy, land use, affordable housing, principle of development 18
Space standards, unit and room sizes, ceiling heights, private outdoor space 11
Heritage, conservation areas, listed buildings 9
Design quality, bulk, massing, appearance, materials 9
Permitted development, prior approval conditions not met 3
Loss of existing use, commercial, employment or community floorspace 3
Neighbour amenity, overlooking, loss of light, privacy, noise 3
Insufficient information, missing reports, surveys or assessments 2
Infrastructure, drainage, energy, biodiversity 2
Read as: “Of every 100 reasons cited in a refusal, 38 relate to other.” A single refusal often names two or more reasons. Based on 102 reasons extracted from refused decision notices.

In Southwark, refusals come from a mix of reasons. No single pattern dominates.

Is Southwark getting busier?

Decisions per quarter have held roughly steady since 2023, and approval rates have drifted upward over the same window.

Decisions per quarter
Approval rate (%)
0 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% borough avg 72% '23 Q2 · 75% · n=20 '23 Q3 · 59% · n=17 '23 Q4 · 85% · n=13 '24 Q1 · 54% · n=13 '24 Q2 · 69% · n=13 '24 Q3 · 76% · n=17 '24 Q4 · 63% · n=19 '25 Q1 · 90% · n=20 '25 Q2 · 87% · n=30 '25 Q3 · 75% · n=16 '25 Q4 · 37% · n=19 '26 Q1 · 100% · n=1 '26 Q4 · 100% · n=2 '23 Q2 '23 Q3 '23 Q4 '24 Q1 '24 Q2 '24 Q3 '24 Q4 '25 Q1 '25 Q2 '25 Q3 '25 Q4 '26 Q1 '26 Q4
Hover any bar or dot for exact quarterly values. The most recent quarter may be partial while pending decisions work through.

Interrogate the data yourself

Every figure on this page comes from Southwark's own planning decisions. We publish the underlying data so you can check it, replicate our findings, or use it in your own tools. Verify against the council's planning portal before relying on any record, and tell us if you spot a problem.

Decided small-site applications, 1 to 9 units. Planning-decision layer only: Energy Performance Certificate, Land Registry and case-officer fields are held back. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Planning London Datahub, Greater London Authority. Method.

About these figures

The figures describe decided applications for one to nine homes. They show what has happened in Southwark over the period covered; they do not predict the outcome of an individual application, and no approval probability is offered for any site or scheme.

Sample sizes are shown with the findings. Where the available evidence is too thin for a result to carry meaning, it is withheld or marked accordingly.

Research using this evidence

All research →

Data sources & method

Applications. Sourced from the Greater London Authority (GLA) Planning Datahub and Southwark Council’s online planning register. Covers full planning, householder, and minor residential applications of nine units or fewer decided in the window shown above.

Decisions and timing. Outcomes and determination times are taken from the council’s published decision notices.

Refusal reasons. Extracted from refused decision notices that were publicly available. Not every refusal has a readable notice, so totals count all refusals but the reason breakdown covers only those we could read.

Scheme classification. Site types (conversion, demolish & rebuild, extension, and so on) are coded from application descriptions and drawings. Areas are mapped from postcodes and ward names using the council’s own sub-area definitions.

Update frequency. Refreshed quarterly. Next refresh: October 2026.

Nothing here is planning advice. Outcomes are historical and do not predict individual cases. Approval rates vary with site specifics, policy context, and case officer. See our Terms of Use for full details on how this data is compiled and the limits of its use.